Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. v. Gahagan
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Wheaton Van Lines appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Saufley, J.) affirming the judgment of the District Court (Bridgton, Donovan, J.) in favor of Hayes Gahagan. Wheaton Van Lines argues the District Court erred as a matter of law in holding that Gahagan’s lack of explicit designation as consignee on the bill of lading shielded him from liability for a $13,756.89 freight bill. We agree and vacate the judgment.
In 1990 Gahagan sold his company, a Maine corporation operated by Gahagan from his Indianapolis home, to a Kentucky-based firm,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lakes Environmental Ass'n v. Town of NaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. Hannaford Bros.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- CSX Transportation Co. v. Novolog Bucks CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- CSX Trans Co v. Novolog Bucks CtyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007