Legal Opinion

Watson v. Cleveland Chair Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1989PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’BRIEN, Justice.

Issues are raised in this case involving federal preemption under the Commercial Motor Safety Act, 49 U.S.C.App. 2301, et seq.; State Court Jurisdiction Over Federal Claims under the provisions of the Act, and the viability of a State cause of action for the retaliatory discharge of at-will employees.

Plaintiffs, Charles Howard Watson and Gilbert Garner Barnett, filed a complaint against defendant, Cleveland Chair Company, alleging that their discharge as employee truck drivers was precipitated because they attempted to excuse themselves from a dinner given by defendant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Pendleton v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API