Legal Opinion

United States v. Lanning

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2011No. 09-1675, 09-1715PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Timothy Andrew Lanning and Paula Marie Calderon were each charged with conspiring to steal and alter checks taken from the mail, which they then presented to unsuspecting stores for merchandise that was later returned for a cash refund. They both pled guilty to the charged offense. The district court subsequently sentenced each of them to 42 months’ imprisonment and required restitution of the amount stolen. In both cases, the court varied upward from the applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) range. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. Tirrell ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Keli DunnicanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Calvin MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Eric WendlandtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API