Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Mylan Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 1, 2015No. Case No. 12-cv-772-ppPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PAMELA PEPPER, District Judge.
This is a products liability action in which the plaintiffs allege that a transdermal fentanyl patch manufactured by defendant Mylan Technologies, Inc. malfunctioned and caused the death of James Hayden. Earlier in this litigation, the court dismissed a number of the plaintiffs’ claims, leaving only their design and manufacturing defect claims remaining. After the court granted the defendants’ motion *969to exclude the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert witness, the plaintiffs elected to proceed on a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervenor-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Schultz Ex Rel. Estate of Schultz v. Akzo Nobel Paints, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Racine Zoological SocietyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Johnson v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
- Reynolds v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021