Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. C R Bard Incorporated
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 15, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00762Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ANGELO REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 19-cv-762-wmc C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., Defendants. In 2014, plaintiff Angelo Reynolds was implanted with a Bard Eclipse Filter, a prescription medical device that is designed to catch blood clots before reaching the heart or lungs. After being implanted, one of the filter’s struts fractured and embedded in the tissue near his spine. Although the main body of the filter was ultimately removed successfully in 2018, the broken strut remains in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Paul S. Hammel, Cross-Appellee v. Eau Galle Cheese FactoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervenor-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.