Legal Opinion

United States v. E. M. "Mike" Riebold and Donald T. Morgan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1977No. 76-1170, 76-1171PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

E. M. “Mike” Riebold (Riebold) and Donald T. Morgan (Morgan) 1 have been found guilty by a jury of receipt of a fee for procuring a loan, aiding and abetting, misapplication of bank funds, false statement in a securities registration statement, wire fraud, interstate transportation of property obtained by fraud, securities, fraud, conspiracy, and mail fraud. 2 On the verdicts, the trial judge entered judgments convicting appellants and sentencing them, from which they appeal.

Appellants were initially charged on December 20, 1974, by an 84 count indictment. This…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Henry Dewitt Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. Standard Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. Larry Eugene Downen, and Keith Paul SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Juan G. RiosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API