Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. American Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1997No. S97A0596PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

The Georgia Department of Transportation (“DOT”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against it in this dispute concerning under what conditions a bidder on a DOT construction contract is obligated to forfeit its bid proposal guaranty. We find that under the circumstances of this case, both the relevant stat*506utory scheme and basic principles of contract law dictate that the bidder was required to forfeit its bid proposal guaranty for refusing to execute a contract it had been awarded by DOT. Therefore, we reverse.

The relevant facts are stipulated to by both…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. NEC Technologies, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Prior v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Board of Edn. v. Sever-Williams Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Amwest Surety Insurance v. Ra-Lin & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. City of Newport News v. Doyle and Russell, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morrell v. Wellstar Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. INNOVATIVE IMAGES, LLC v. SUMMERVILLESupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. Coppler & Mannick, P.C. v. WakelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Estate of MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Decision One Mortgage Co. v. Victor Warren Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API