Legal Opinion

Schraeder v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 7, 1923No. 10,368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Hulda Sophie Mitchell, defendant in error, had judgment against Schraeder and Paddock for the possession of eig'ht cows and they bring error. Schraeder was sheriff and took the cattle on an execution against Joseph B. Mitchell, the husband of the plaintiff. Paddock apparently was made a special deputy to take the cattle and custodian *322to hold. them. He rounded them up on the range for the sheriff, and held them for him.

Three defenses were pleaded: First, denial of plaintiff’s ownership; second, ownership in judgment debtor, Joseph B. Mitchell; third, estoppel by conduct.

As to the first, we are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hallett v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Payne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Whitney v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Coors v. ReaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Russell v. LawtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Susman v. Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Clay, Robinson & Co. v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Allan v. Diamond T Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Standard Motor Co. v. American Loan System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Wade v. NowelsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API