Legal Opinion

Susman v. Exchange National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 7, 1947No. 15,546PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

A proceeding in intervention involving money in a bank account, being held pursuant to garnishment. Findings and judgment were in favor of the intervener.

It appears that in February, 1931, an industrial bank was given judgment against one Taylor, in the sum of $1,965; that about five years subsequent thereto plaintiff in error became assignee of the judgment; that July 15, 1943, or seven years after the assignment, execution was issued on the judgment, and in aid thereof garnishment summons was served on a Denver commercial bank; that July 27, 1943, the bank answered that the judgment debtor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Griffith v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  4. Marx v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Morrill v. RaymondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dove v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. University of Colorado v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Federal Lumber Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Republic National Life Insurance Company, a Texas Corporation v. Red Lion Homes, Inc., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Ginsberg v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API