Legal Opinion
Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Martinez
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,317; No. 10,319; No. 10,320PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
These cases together with Nos. 10,316, and 10,318, Clay, Robinson and Company v. Atencio, and Clay, Robinson & Company v. Casias, (74 Colo. 17) were in replevin for sheep. The plaintiffs had judgment for possession or their value and the defendants, Clay, Robinson & Co., bring error. In the cases of Martinez, Moeller and Bards*12ley the court is unanimous in the conclusions reached in this opinion; in the cases of Atencio and Casias it is divided, and a separate opinion is filed concerning them. All five cases were tried together; one abstract and one set of briefs are filed in this court. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hamilton v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- A. H. Andrews & Co. v. Colorado Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Woodward v. EdmundsUtah Supreme Court · 1899
- Robinson v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Otto-Johnson Mercantile Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1928
- Pope v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- First National Bank Of Fleming v. Paul K. PetzoldtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- First State Bank v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Clay, Robinson & Co. v. AtencioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.