Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thompson v. New York Central Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 17, 1966No. 215, Docket 30105Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLumbard, Chief Judge

I agree with that part of the majority’s opinion which affirms the denial of a preliminary injunction. I concur with the majority’s dismissal of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act count on a different ground, but I would go further and dismiss that portion of the complaint as to all defendants. And I dissent from that' portion of the opinion which remands the Railway Labor Act count to the National Railroad Adjustment Board (NRAB).

I. The Railway Labor Act Count

In my opinion, the majority’s disposition of this count is a serious departure from the trend of decisions in most…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Gene Detroy v. American Guild of Variety Artists, Joey Adams, as Its President and Joe Smith, as Its TreasurerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API