Legal Opinion

State v. . Brinkley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 22, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After the State had produced its evidence and rested its case, the defendants moved to dismiss the action for want of sufficient evidence to sustain the prosecution. They excepted to the court's denial of their motion and introduced evidence, and at the close of all the evidence again moved for judgment as of nonsuit. To the refusal of the latter motion they excepted, and now insist that they are entitled to the benefit of the first, as well as the second exception. Both the terms of the statute and the decisions of the Court are adverse to this argument. The defendants are entitled to the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. State v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  5. State v. . TrottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kalb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. State v. . KeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. . NortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . MarionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. State v. . EarpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API