Legal Opinion

State v. . Norton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

There are two questions for decision:

First: Is there error in refusing motion for judgment as of nonsuit at close of all tbe evidence under provisions of C. S., 4643?

Appellant concedes that if testimony of bis codefendant, Liston Carter, and bis witnesses be taken into consideration in passing upon tbe motion, tbe evidence against him, Hector Norton, presents a case for tbe jury. He contends, however, that in view of tbe fact that be is charged in separate bill of indictment from that against bis codefendant, Liston Carter, tbe consolidation of the cases for purpose of trial should not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. . ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. . KlineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. State v. . MedleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API