Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Melinda

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1993No. S-5007PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

In this case we must decide whether an agent authorized to act on his principal’s behalf under a power of attorney may file and prosecute a civil action pro se in his principal’s stead. We hold that he may not.

I

James C. Sanders executed a statutory form power of attorney that appointed Ray Christiansen attorney-in-fact authorized to act on Sanders’ behalf in all matters relating to an apartment complex owned by Sanders. 1 On March 26, 1991, pursuant to his authority as attorney-in-fact, Christian-sen attempted to file a small claims action on behalf of Sanders. Lester…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re the Estate of HutchinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re RobsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Pister v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API