Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co v. Clark's Estate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1924No. 14094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

POSTER, C.

This controversv grows out of exceptions to the final report of Mary A. Clark, as guardian of Levi Scott Clark, a minor, filed by the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a corporation, as surety upon an additional bond executed by such guardian in connection with the sale of certain real estate belonging to the minor. The county court of Cherokee county, Okla., charged the guardian with the sum of $1,600, representing the proceeds from the sale of certain real estate belonging to the minor which had been lost through the failure of the Central National Bank of Tahlequah, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hutson v. JensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In Re Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warrior Water Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Hudson v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Hammons v. Musselman, Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Neff v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API