Legal Opinion
Castetter v. Barnard
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 1932No. 14,333PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeal, J.
This action was instituted by the Tuxedo State Bank against Roy E. Castetter, cashier of the named bank and London and Lancashire Indemnity Company of America, surety on Castetter’s bond running to the bank as obligee. After the filing of the complaint a receiver was appointed for the bank and he was substituted as plaintiff.
The amended complaint consists of three paragraphs. The first two paragraphs are practically the same. The allegations are to the effect that Castetter, while in the employ of the bank, and while in the performance of his duties as cashier, either directly or in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M. B. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Omaha Bank for Cooperatives v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Lain v. LainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- M. B. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Jack G. Montgomery, Helen R. Montgomery, Mary L. Morris, Mary T. Smith, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Omaha Bank for Cooperatives v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981