Legal Opinion

Ives v. Leonard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

The plaintiffs sought to recover upon a. promissory note of this tenor.

“ $80. Menominee, Wis., December 18,1880.
“January 10th, after date, I promise to pay to the order of Ives and Mathews eighty dollars, at their office, Menominee, Wis., with interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per' annum, after due, until paid. Yalue received.

Edward Leonard.”

Leonard filed a sworn denial of the note. The genuineness of the signature was not disputed. The defense was that the instrument was given in fact for eight dollars, and had been fraudulently raised to eighty.

The plaintiffs composed the law firm of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Storrs v. ScougaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kolka v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bivens v. Detroit Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Weeks v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API