People v. Hawthorne
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceButzel, J.
I concur in affirmance, but 1 cannot agree with the proposition of my brother McAllister that because insanity is a disease and comes within the realm of medical science that only physicians are competent to answer hypothetical questions on behalf of a defendant in a criminal case. The law does not require a rule so formal, and I do not think we further the cause of justice by insisting that only a medical man may completely advise on the subject of mental condition. The proposed witness was a graduate of Tilton School in New Hampshire, Wesleyan University, Yale University; and Harvard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Evans v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- People v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- McEwen v. BigelowMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Kelley v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.