Legal Opinion
Roth v. Hyer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1943No. 10255PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was for damages for breach of a contract of sale of a chose in action, a claim of defendants against the United Cigar Stores Company, a corporation, then in 77B reorganization proceedings. Bankr. Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207. The claim was that defendants, Hyer and Davis & Son Co., through their attorney and agent Schelker, authorized to act and acting for them, had contracted to sell the -claim to plaintiffs, by accepting an offer plaintiffs had made by telephone and confirming that acceptance by letter.1 There was an alternative claim against defendant Dickinson…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Roth v. HyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Hester v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Wittlin v. GiacaloneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- A. M. Amen v. William H. Black, A. M. Amen v. William H. Black and Ruth F. Black, D. Arthur Walker and Fred D. Windish, Co-Receivers of Black-Marshall Oil Company v. William H. Black and Ruth F. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Amen v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956