Legal Opinion

Hester v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 19, 1968No. Civ. A. 8747PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

This action charges conspiracy to defraud and fraud against the plaintiffs by the corporate defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company and the three named defendants Keith Jones, his wife, Estelle Jones, and one Edward F. Egan. Defendant Egan is sued individually and as an agent of New Amsterdam Casualty Company, however, he resides without the jurisdiction of this court and he has not been served. The court lacks jurisdiction to render judgment against Egan individually.

Jurisdiction, as alleged in the complaint, is based on diversity and a controversy in excess of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Williams v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. Oshiek v. OshiekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lister v. NationsBankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Vanwyk Textile Systems, B v. v. Zimmer MacHinery America, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997
  4. Cremi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  5. Hailey v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API