Hester v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
This action charges conspiracy to defraud and fraud against the plaintiffs by the corporate defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company and the three named defendants Keith Jones, his wife, Estelle Jones, and one Edward F. Egan. Defendant Egan is sued individually and as an agent of New Amsterdam Casualty Company, however, he resides without the jurisdiction of this court and he has not been served. The court lacks jurisdiction to render judgment against Egan individually.
Jurisdiction, as alleged in the complaint, is based on diversity and a controversy in excess of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Williams v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Oshiek v. OshiekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lister v. NationsBankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Vanwyk Textile Systems, B v. v. Zimmer MacHinery America, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Cremi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Hailey v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.