Legal Opinion
United States v. McCreary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1932No. 6811PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Appellant claims error on denying a motion for directed verdict for insufficiency of evidence. It is admitted that a war risk insurance policy was issued to plaintiff while in service, and was in force at discharge.
The plaintiff testified, in substance, that while in service he was under “shell fire.” “We went in a dug-in in a hill and we dug into what was called 'Dead Man’s Hill.’ * * * We were there only four hours. Shells exploded within ten or fifteen feet of me and the man next to me died * * * The dysentery was — the bowels run off. It was the diarrhea. That is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. SlighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. Le DucCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Deadrich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Personius v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.