Legal Opinion
Personius v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1933No. 6891PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE,- Circuit Judge.
The sole point involved in this appeal is whether or not the lower court erred in sustaining a general and special demurrer to the eomplaint.
■ This, in turn, involves the single question as to whether or not a veteran can recover under war risk insurance certificates if his eom-plaint alleges that “he was totally and permanently disabled from October 31,1918, until January 1,1929"; but fails to allege that he was totally and permanently disabled the time he brought suit, namely, on December 10, 1931.
The eomplaint sets forth that the appellant served in the United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- United States v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Mead v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corrigan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Gay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.