Legal Opinion

Danchatz v. Page Coal & Coke Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1931No. 6889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This action of trespass on the ease was instituted by Frank Danehatz and Mary Danehatz, father and mother of Joe Danehatz, against the Page Coal & Coke Company, to recover for loss of services occasioned by the wrongful act of the defendant, resulting in the loss of the right hand and a portion of the right forearm of the said Joe Danehatz, their infant son. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and this writ of error is prosecuted from the judgment rendered upon the same.

It is alleged in tlie declaration, and tbe proof tends to show, that Joe Danchatz, then a youth of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bloss v. PlymaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Maslin's Ex'rs v. HiettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Rutherford v. RutherfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hoke v. HokeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Roselawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Thornton v. Charleston Area Medical CenterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Porter v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Blair v. DickinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Workman v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API