Legal Opinion
Hickham v. Chronister
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1989No. 55586PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.
This action was commenced by plaintiff seeking to obtain possession of plastic injection molds fabricated by defendant pursuant to a contract. Having successfully obtained possession, plaintiff now appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering him to pay the contract price for the molds. We affirm.
Plaintiff is an orthodontist who also designs and sells orthodontic appliances. Defendant is a tool and dye maker engaged in the fabrication of plastic injection molds. In 1983, plaintiff approached defendant regarding the manufacture of a saliva ejector consisting of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Price Brothers Company, Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Gear Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Yamnitz v. Polytech, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- The Singer Company, a Corporation v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Long v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Paramount Sales Co., Inc. v. StarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rolscreen Company, an Iowa Corporation v. Pella Products of St. Louis, Incorporated, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Campbell v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- John H. Williams Ellen B. Williams v. Agribank, Fcb, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- McCarthy Building Companies v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002