Armstrong v. Armstrong
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
We are called upon to resolve choice-of-law questions arising from an automobile accident which occurred in the Yukon Territory, Dominion of Canada. As a result of the accident, appellant instituted a personal injury action against his wife in the Superior Court of the State of Alaska. 1 Appellee moved for summary judgment on the ground that the laws of Yukon Territory, Dominion of Canada, prohibit inter-spousal suits based upon negligently inflicted harms occurring while the parties were lawfully married and living together as husband and wife. 2 Prior to the date…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- First National Bank in Fort Collins v. RostekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Coffindaffer v. CoffindafferWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.