Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1968No. 922PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

We are called upon to resolve choice-of-law questions arising from an automobile accident which occurred in the Yukon Territory, Dominion of Canada. As a result of the accident, appellant instituted a personal injury action against his wife in the Superior Court of the State of Alaska. 1 Appellee moved for summary judgment on the ground that the laws of Yukon Territory, Dominion of Canada, prohibit inter-spousal suits based upon negligently inflicted harms occurring while the parties were lawfully married and living together as husband and wife. 2 Prior to the date…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. First National Bank in Fort Collins v. RostekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Coffindaffer v. CoffindafferWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API