Legal Opinion

State v. Chabonian

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1971No. State 72PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

On the issue of admissibility of the admission made by the defendant to the police officer that he knew the automobile was stolen when he purchased it, three facts must be accepted as established:

1. It was made after the defendant had been fully informed of his constitutional rights as required by Miranda. 1

2. It was volunteered.2

3. It was made after the defendant had retained counsel, and while he was represented by said counsel.

*579If the defendant did not have a lawyer representing him, it is clear that the first two facts would require a finding that his volunteered admission was admissible.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dunlavy v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HattonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Garcia v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Buckner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gibson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API