Legal Opinion

Doremus v. Mayor of Paterson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 15, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On award and ascertainment of damages. Heard on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, V. C.

This is a suit brought by twenty-five complainants against the city of Paterson. Its original object was an injunction to restrain the city from polluting the water of the Passaic river and from interfering with the enjoyment by the complainants of their rights as riparian owners. It was thought by the court of errors and appeals that in view of the delay in instituting the proceedings, and more especially in view of the magnitude of the injury that would result from prohibiting the use of the sewers to the people of Paterson, it would be inequitable to enjoin, if relief could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jutte v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Emery v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Yara Engineering Corp. v. NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Salt Lake City v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Birchwood Lakes Colony Club v. Medford LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API