Legal Opinion

Miller v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1926No. Docket No. 5483PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An appeal from a judgment foreclosing a lien created. by a contract providing for the repayment to William Miller, respondent’s intestate, of sums to be advanced by him for the payment of taxes upon two parcels of land the title to which was in litigation, it being agreed that such repayment should be made by appellants in the event the latter should be adjudged the owners thereof.

The litigation having resulted in favor of appellants, this action was brought to establish the amounts paid, and to foreclose the lien upon the two parcels mentioned. The appeal is presented on the judgment-roll…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Trower v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Colton Land & Water Co. v. SwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Miller v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Maltby v. ConklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Kenai v. Kenai Peninsula Newspapers, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. City Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API