Legal Opinion

Huyser v. Boards of School Inspectors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1902No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Certiorari by Cornelius Huys'er to review the action of the township boards of school inspectors of the townships of Zeeland, Olive, and Blendon in establishing a school district. From a judgment declaring the proceedings void, respondents bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Certiorari to review the action of the boards of school inspectors in establishing a school district. Twenty-two freeholders of the township of Blendon petitioned the boards of school inspectors of the townships of Blendon, Zeeland, and Olive to organize a new school district in said' township of Blendon, to be known as “School District No. 8; ” the boundaries of said district to be formed from fractional districts No. 4 of Blendon and Zeeland, No. 4 of Zeeland and Blendon', No. 5 of Blendon and Olive, and No. 3 of Blendon. The inspectors met March 14, 1901, and proceeded to organize the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fractional School District No. 1 v. Joint Board of School InspectorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Perrizo v. KeslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Roeser v. GartlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gentle v. Board of School InspectorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Parman v. Boards of School InspectorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connine v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API