Parman v. Boards of School Inspectors
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to the township boards of school inspectors of the townships of Henrietta and Waterloo, in Jackson county, and Bunker Hill and Stoekbridge, in Ingham ■county, to bring up the proceedings had before them in the formation of a fractional school-district from the townships of Henrietta, Bunker Hill and Stoekbridge.
Read the full summary
Certiorari to the township boards of school inspectors of the townships of Henrietta and Waterloo, in Jackson county, and Bunker Hill and Stoekbridge, in Ingham ■county, to bring up the proceedings had before them in the formation of a fractional school-district from the townships of Henrietta, Bunker Hill and Stoekbridge. The affidavit for the writ sets forth as jurisdictional irregularities the fact that (1) as no land was taken from the township of Waterloo, the participation of the township board of that •township invalidated the joint action taken; (2) that no meeting was held by the…
1Opinion of the Court
Graves, O. J.
This writ of certiorari was issued March Both, and no attempt seems to have been made to serve it until the lYth of April, and then no copy of the papers on which it was allowed was served with it. The respondents-were not bound to take any notice of it. At that time the-organization of the district had become complete; a tax had been voted to build a school-house and a contract made for its construction, and during some of the most important of these proceedings, the writ although issued was allowed to slumber and no good reason appears for the delay. In the interval important…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Carroll v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- People ex rel. Macauley v. BurdetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Gentle v. Board of School InspectorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Loesche v. GoerdtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.