Legal Opinion

Foote v. Greilick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1911No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by William O. Eoote, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of the Traverse City Motor Boat Company, against Clarence L. Greilick on a stock subscription. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

The plaintiff, a trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of the Traverse City Motor Boat Company, a corporation, and an adjudicated bankrupt, brought this action against one of its stockholders, who was also a director, upon an alleged subscription for stock. He defended in the circuit court upon the ground that said subscription was not a legal obligation against him, and has appealed from a directed verdict. There is little dispute about the facts.

This corporation was organized in 1905 with an authorized capital of $10,000. Only 919 shares of this stock were issued, and of these 120, issued to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Schenectady and Saratoga Plank Road Co. v. . ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Stutz v. HandleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Mortgage Bond Homestead Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Voorhies v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Schwemer v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Campbell v. RavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Missouri Valley Grocery Co. v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API