Stutz v. Handley
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee
In Equity. Creditors’ bill.
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
The complainants, on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of the Clifton Coal Company who may choose to come in, bring this suit to reach and subject to the payment of their debts against the company the amounts remaining unpaid upon shares of the capital stock *532of said corporation held and owned by the several individual defendants.,’ The material facts of the case, on which the questions of law7 arise and the rights of the parties depend, are but little controverted, and are as follows: In June, 1883, (he Clifton Coal Company was organized under the general laws of Kentucky. Chapter…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scott v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Manhattan Trust Co. v. Seattle Coal & Iron Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Conway v. Owensboro Savings Bank & Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1908
- Benbow v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Conway v. Owensboro Savings Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.