Legal Opinion
United States v. Jackson C. O'dell, III
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1998No. 96-6733PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the District Court’s dismissal with prejudice under the Speedy Trial Act (hereinafter “STA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174, of two counts of a four-count indictment against defendant Jackson C. O’Dell III (hereinafter “O’Dell”). The District Court held that ninety-three days of nonexcludable delay had elapsed, exceeding the STA’s seventy day-limit. Sixty-three of those days elapsed during proceedings on a prior information filed against O’Dell in 1993. Because a not guilty plea was never entered as required by the STA’s plain language, we hold…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Dean JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John Wesley Tootle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jackson C. O'dell, Iii, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Anthony Dejohn (02-3158) Christopher Harb (02-3175)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jackson C. O'dell, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Richard MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. TinklenbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.