Wells v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
An action against financial advisors who rendered opinions on the financial fairness to shareholders of a proposed leveraged buyout is barred by a release in settlement of a prior Delaware class action challenging the buyout. While the financial advisors were not parties to the Delaware class action, we conclude that, applying the law of Delaware or the law of New York, the release discharging the named defendants, their "agents * * * representatives * * * or anyone else”, unambiguously precluded the pending action.
I
Plaintiff, Rosalind Wells, brings this action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M EnterprisesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Alsup v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Peterson v. ReginaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Nycal Corp. v. INOCO PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P. v. Chien KuoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.