Legal Opinion

Apex Universal, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 21, 1998No. Court No. 95-03-00330Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

DiCarlo, Senior Judge:

This action is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff challenges the United States Customs Service tariff classification of ceramic raised pavement markers under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 6908.90.00 as “Glazed ceramic flags and paving, hearth or wall tiles * * *: Other” subject to a duty rate of 19 percent ad valorem. HTSUS § XIII, ch. 69 (Supp. 1 1993 & Supp. 2 1994).

Plaintiff seeks summary judgment under U.S. Ct. Int’l Trade R. 56(a) in favor of its claimed classification of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API