Legal Opinion

Pignato v. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 23, 1996No. Civil Action No. 3:95cv461PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAYNE, District Judge.

John C. Pignato, a former employee of the Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) of the Commonwealth of Virginia, instituted this action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pignato also asserted a breach of contract claim under state law.

The Commonwealth and Peter W. Schmidt, the Director of the DEQ, have moved for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) Pignato’s claims are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel; (2) Pignato has failed…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ResnickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. Hurdle v. Virginia Department of Environmental QualityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  3. Amos-Goodwin v. Charleston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. Grant v. Southside Regional JailDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API