Pignato v. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
John C. Pignato, a former employee of the Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) of the Commonwealth of Virginia, instituted this action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pignato also asserted a breach of contract claim under state law.
The Commonwealth and Peter W. Schmidt, the Director of the DEQ, have moved for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) Pignato’s claims are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel; (2) Pignato has failed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ResnickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Hurdle v. Virginia Department of Environmental QualityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Amos-Goodwin v. Charleston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Grant v. Southside Regional JailDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019