Legal Opinion

United States v. George

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2010No. 08-30339PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed September 29, 2010 is amended by deleting footnote 3 and inserting the following footnote 3 in its place:

3 The registration requirements became applicable to pre-SORNA sex offenders no later than the February 28, 2007 issuance of the Attorney General’s interim order. 72 Fed. Reg. 8894. Because George’s failure to register occurred several months after the interim order issued, the parties do not address — and we need not resolve — whether SORNA’s registration requirements apply to pre-SORNA sex offenders upon the statute’s July 27, 2006 enactment or upon the later…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. ValverdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. FeltsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. YelloweagleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Cabrera-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API