Legal Opinion
United States v. Valverde
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2010No. 09-10063PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The Government appeals a decision of the district court dismissing the indictment of Mark Anthony Valverde (“Valverde”) under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq., on the ground that the registration and penalty provisions of the statute under which Valverde was charged, 42 U.S.C. § 16913; 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(2)(B), are invalid exercises of congressional power under the Commerce Clause. U.S. Const, art. I, § 8, cl. 3. We stayed this matter pending a decision on that issue in United States v. George, 625 F.3d…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alcaraz v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.