Legal Opinion
State v. Atherton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 18, 2001No. 45976-7-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 P.3d 1123 (2001)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Anthony Lloyd ATHERTON, Appellant.
No. 45976-7-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 18, 2001.
Eric J. Nielsen, Nielsen, Broman & Associates PLLC, Seattle, for Appellant.
Daniel Jason Clark, King County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Seattle, for Respondent.
BAKER, J.
Anthony Atherton did not appear for the last day of his trial because he had been incarcerated on an unrelated charge. The trial court found that Atherton had voluntarily waived his right to be present at trial, and refused to grant a mistrial. Atherton was found guilty,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. EppsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Martin FontanezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. GarzaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GarzaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. ThurlbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.