State v. Thurlby
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Tammera Michelle Thurlby appeals her three convictions for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. She argues that the trial court (1) violated her constitutional right to be present when it resumed the second day of trial in her absence and (2) failed to adequately consider on the record the presumption against waiver of her right to be present at trial. We hold that the *920trial court did not abuse its discretion in continuing the trial in Thurlby’s absence and that the trial court adequately considered on the record the presumption against waiver. Therefore, we affirm.
Sutton, J.
*920FACTS
¶2…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. IrbyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ThomsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FrawleyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GarzaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ThurlbyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ThurlbyWashington Supreme Court · 2015