Legal Opinion

State v. Mays

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 22, 1968No. 2 CA-CR 92PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Gary Allen Mays has appealed from a conviction of assault with a deadly weapon and has presented for review two questions relating to the admission of testimony and evidence.

Considering the testimony most favorably in support of the State’s case, we find that near midnight on the 22d of August, 1966, the complaining witness, Dawson, and five other high school students were swimming in the St. Ambrose swimming pool in Tucson. A 1966 Cadillac, the color of which is in conflict, drove near the area and circled the block several times. The swimmers departed from their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. . Del VermoNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. State v. CumboArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. MacIllrath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Geary v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. State v. WatkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API