MacIllrath v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The question here is whether Rule 31(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1 required the District Court in a trial for assault with a dangerous weapon 2 to instruct the jury that they might find the defendant guilty of the lesser offense of simple assault. We think not. The rule does not in terms require the instruction. If there is no evidence to justify a verdict of simple assault a jury should not be so instructed. Burcham v. United States, 1947, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 283, 163 F.2d 761. To do so would only tend to confuse and mislead the jury.
The defendant was tried upon a three count…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Burcham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Hickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Albert B. Brooke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- James W. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Horace Marion Larson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- State v. PallanckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Gordon Korb Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.