Caceres v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
At Law. Action by Luis Caceres against the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation and the United States Line. On motion of the Fleet Corporation to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the defendant United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, pursuant to section 278 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for the direction of judgment dismissing the complaint herein, on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant.
So much of section 278 of the Civil Practice Act of the state of New York as is necessary for consideration in the action at bar reads as follows:
“Sec. 278. Certain Objections; When Waived. An objection on either of the following grounds,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- St. Louis v. Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Panama R. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Leon v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- State of Alabama Ex Rel. Charles A. Graddick, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Gorman v. A. B. Leach & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
- Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commercial Trust Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.