Legal Opinion
Milliken & Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Motions insofar as they seek leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals are granted; separate motions for clarification and/or reargument are granted to the extent of recalling and vacating the unpublished decision and order of this Court entered on September 14, 1993 (Appeal No. 49094-49096), and substituting a new decision and order as follows: Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about March 6, 1991, as resettled in orders entered September 2, 1992, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating against defendant Con Edison the claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. FMC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Grow Tunneling Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Kirsch Beverage Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Milliken & Co. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Milliken & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Sanwep Restaurant Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994