Legal Opinion

Milliken & Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Upon the Court’s own motion the Decision and Order of this Court entered on December 9, 1993 (199 AD2d 75) are hereby recalled and vacated and the following Decision and Order substituted therefor as follows:

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about March 6, 1991, as resettled in orders entered September 2, 1992, modified on the law, to the extent of reinstating against defendant Con Edison the claims (including for loss of profits) of those plaintiffs which were dismissed for lack of privity with the utility, and dismissing the claims against the real…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. FMC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API