Legal Opinion
Kirsch Beverage Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for lost profits, the plaintiff appeals, inter alia, on the ground of insufficiency, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated October 17, 1985, which, upon granting its motion for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of it and against the defendant in the principal amount of only $103.26.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
This case involves another of many claims against the defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York for losses caused by the blackout of July 13-14, 1977 (see, e.g., Koch v Consolidated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. FMC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grow Tunneling Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gazzola Building Corp. v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Grow Tunneling Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Milliken & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Milliken & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.