Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Eagleton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 19, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We have before us two appeals which arise out of criminal complaints charging the defendant with (1) violating G. L. c. 140, § 67 (1986 ed.), by not allowing an authorized officer to conduct an inspection pursuant to G. L. c. 140, § 66 (1986 ed.), 2 and (2) storing inflammable fluids without a license in violation of G. L. c. 148, § 13 (1986 ed.). The principal issue is whether police officers constitutionally were entitled to conduct a warrantless inspection of the defendant’s licensed auto body shop and used car business pursuant to G. L. c. 140, § 66. We hold that they were and thus affirm…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Pueblo v. Ferreira MoralesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. TartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BizarriaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API