Commonwealth v. Bizarria
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
This interlocutory appeal by the Commonwealth urges that we hold valid „a warrantless administrative search conducted under G. L. c. 90, § 32. A judge of the District Court found the search was without the consent of the defendant and a subterfuge to avoid the burden of establishing probable cause to support a criminal investigative search. The judge allowed, on State constitutional grounds, the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search. The Commonwealth argues that the judge’s *371findings were clearly erroneous. We affirm the order allowing the defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commonwealth v. AccaputoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. SteedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Commonwealth v. Krisco Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. Garcia-GermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.