Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bizarria

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 20, 1991No. 90-P-1160PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

This interlocutory appeal by the Commonwealth urges that we hold valid „a warrantless administrative search conducted under G. L. c. 90, § 32. A judge of the District Court found the search was without the consent of the defendant and a subterfuge to avoid the burden of establishing probable cause to support a criminal investigative search. The judge allowed, on State constitutional grounds, the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search. The Commonwealth argues that the judge’s *371findings were clearly erroneous. We affirm the order allowing the defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. AccaputoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SteedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. Krisco Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. Garcia-GermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API