Legal Opinion

Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. State Racing Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1989PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The plaintiff filed suit in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County seeking a declaration that the “human drug testing” regulation adopted by the State Racing Commission (commission), 205 Code Mass. Regs. § 4.57 (1986), violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, arts. 1, 10, 12, and 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, G. L. c. 12, § 111 (1986 ed.), and the right of privacy statute, G. L. c. 214, § IB (1986 ed.), and that the regulation’s provision permitting immediate suspension of licensees who test…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Duarte v. HealyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Landry v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Dimeo v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. O'CONNOR v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API