Legal Opinion
Adair v. EQT Production Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided September 14, 2012No. Nos. 1:10-cv-00037, 1:10-cv-00041, 1:11-cv-00031PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, United States Magistrate Judge.
These three cases are before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion To Compel Kevin West Emails, which was filed in each of the cases. (I:10cv37 — Docket Item No. 400; l:10cv41— Docket Item No. 223; l:llcv31 — Docket Item No. 189) (collectively, “Motions”). The Motions are ripe and ready for decision, and none of the parties have requested oral argument. Based on the reasoning set forth below, the Motions will be granted in part and taken under advisement in part.
I. Facts
The plaintiffs, Robert Adair and Eva Mae Adkins, sue EQT…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adair v. EQT Production Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- Chevalier-Seawell v. MangumNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2015
- Hempel v. Cydan Development, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020